~ / benchmarks
##Benchmarks
Compare models.
### Suites & harnesses 28
Shopping-query relevance classification (exact / substitute / complement / irrelevant) at Amazon scale. A Jev Decision Index component.
Alibaba's tool-use benchmark for whether a model picks the right API call. A Jev Decision Index component.
AI2's grade-school science MCQs in Easy and Challenge splits. Part of the standard MCQ battery used in Jev vs Luna Decisions comparisons.
Audio-decision counterpart to Image JevBench, for the multimodal entrants (Clef-omni, d1-omni, NeuDecide).
77 fine-grained banking intents over 13k queries. Single-domain counterpart to CLINC150, and the benchmark Janus reports wins on. CC BY 4.0.
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard: the field's standard for function/tool-call accuracy (ICML 2025). A Jev Decision Index component.
Reasoning-intensive retrieval benchmark scored by nDCG — the Jev Decision Index's reranking component, and one Jev still leads.
150 in-scope intents plus explicit out-of-scope examples. Useful for routing, abstention, and confidence-threshold tests. CC BY 3.0.
80 scenarios and 293 questions per tier (medium is rules-based, hard is judgment calls), with a cost-per-decision axis baked in. What Jev-Omni reports on. Apache 2.0.
TypeSafe's workflow evals: four production-shaped workflows scored against frontier LLM reference probabilities.
Fastino's held-out suite: 17 operational domains × 300 examples each, scoring Jev, SemIf, Laya, and GLiFormer head-to-head on the same inputs. First-party to GLiNER2.5-Decide, which tops it.
Graduate-level, Google-proof MCQs; the Diamond subset is the hard tier. Part of the standard MCQ battery used in Jev vs Luna Decisions comparisons.
Grade-school math word problems; repurposed as multiple choice with random distractors (4- and 10-option conditions in the Jev vs Luna comparison).
Commonsense sentence-completion MCQs. Part of the standard MCQ battery used in Jev vs Luna Decisions comparisons.
Held-out image-decision suite: 684 items (228 public / 456 sealed) with frozen hashes and contamination tracking — it flagged Kev's Mind2Web training overlap itself. Jev-Omni, decider-vision, and Reflex top it; frontier chat APIs score near zero.
Community index aggregating ~43 decision-model evals — intent classification, function calling, tool retrieval, reranking — plus latency. The benchmark surface Clef's launch numbers report on.
Independent decision-model leaderboard (run by Benchmark Heaven, not TypeSafe): 1,500 typed decisions per system scored on intelligence, calibration, latency, and cost, with versioned releases, published methodology, and result JSON. Two boards — open weights and hosted API — across ~75 systems; the hosted board currently ranks Sage #1, d1 #2, Mercury Decide #3, Jev #4.
Agent evals and guardrails as Jev decisions: one request per trace. Runs locally on Kev or Laya. From Openlayer.
Community typed-decision suites (customer service, invoices, security incidents, agent traces) the open implementations report accuracy and calibration against. Apache 2.0.
Multilingual intent-and-slot dataset (about 1M utterances, 52 languages) for testing whether a fast decision layer generalizes. CC BY 4.0.
The standard 57-subject multitask MCQ benchmark. Part of the standard MCQ battery used in Jev vs Luna Decisions comparisons.
Harder MMLU successor with 10-option questions and more reasoning. Part of the standard MCQ battery used in Jev vs Luna Decisions comparisons.
Multistep soft-reasoning MCQs (murder mysteries, object placements, team allocation). Part of the standard MCQ battery used in Jev vs Luna Decisions comparisons.
2,000-email phishing benchmark plus a 220k-run adjudicated grid showing how system-prompt config swings detection. A Jev Decision Index component.
Head-to-head of System One models: Laya vs Jev on byte-identical inputs.
ACL 2025 tool-retrieval benchmark: 7.6k retrieval tasks over a 43k-tool corpus, scored by nDCG@10. A Jev Decision Index component.
Evaluates tool-calling decisions rather than accuracy: when to call, when to ask a follow-up, when to admit the tools can't answer. A Jev Decision Index component — and one Jev still leads.
Pronoun-resolution commonsense MCQs, adversarially filtered. Part of the standard MCQ battery used in Jev vs Luna Decisions comparisons.
### Probes & studies 6
Measures a confidence threshold on your labeled data, then routes Jev vs a larger model. Ships no default: on Banking77 routing wins; on Web of Science it says do not route.
Independent look at Jev 1.13.0: option-order bias, facts lost in the middle of long context, and cases where a correct prerequisite still leads to the wrong action. Raw payloads and offline verification included.
Independent calibration, selective-risk, and latency measurements of Jev against GLiNER and other baselines.
Independent calibration test on tasks Jev cannot have seen: 900 rule-generated tickets plus public benchmarks, with ECE noise floors and a temperature refit.
Jev vs Claude Haiku 4.5 on 2,000 phishing emails: accuracy, calibration, latency, and cost, reproducible.
Jev vs Cohere Rerank 4 vs zerank-2 vs a chat baseline on 14 datasets. Every raw response saved. nDCG@10 is a tie, not a win.
nothing matches. try fewer words, or clear a filter.